Audit Trail & Compliance
TradeOS records reviewable evidence around important system decisions so users, operators, and qualified reviewers can understand what the system saw, what it said, and what happened later.
The audit trail exists to support accountability. It connects market evidence, signal context, risk review, operator decisions, validation outcomes, and later corrections without turning public intelligence into a profit claim or execution instruction.
What The Audit Trail Supports
| Review Need | How TradeOS Supports It |
|---|---|
| Evidence review | Records connect claims back to source-backed context. |
| Decision review | Risk, validation, and operator decisions can be inspected in sequence. |
| Outcome review | Paper validation, replay, and follow-up labels help compare earlier views with later results. |
| Change review | Corrections, material changes, and rejected claims remain part of the review history. |
| Diligence review | Qualified reviewers can inspect supporting exports through controlled review channels. |
What Reviewers Should Expect
An audit package can show:
- the evidence available at the time of a signal, thesis, or review event;
- the risk and validation state attached to the decision;
- whether an outcome was paper validation, replay, or live-capital context;
- later corrections, material changes, or follow-up labels;
- any external attestation material tied to the reviewed record.
Public Claim Boundary
When TradeOS says a signal, thesis, or review event was recorded, reviewed, or attested, that is an evidence-chain claim. It is not a profit claim, investment advice, account-management claim, or guarantee of future returns.
Public-intelligence outputs remain research and review context. Controlled execution, if used by an operator, remains separate from public intelligence and subject to the operator's own controls.